The focus of this normative case study was how journalists ought to report on celebrity mental health experiences. Grounded in the social responsibility theory of the press, this study used critical discourse analysis to abductively analyze 435 news articles and transcripts covering Britney Spears’s 13-year conservatorship. This study identifies five discourses – decline, spectacle, control, protection, and captivity – that were central in the representation of Spears’s mental health and her experience in the conservatorship. The study also finds that news coverage of Spears’s conservatorship, to varying degrees, fulfilled five knowledge brokership functions: awareness, accessibility, engagement, linkage, and mobilization. Finally, the study highlights four key ethical issues in the news coverage about Spears’s conservatorship. Based on these findings, this study proposes six normative criteria that journalists ought to follow when reporting on mental health.
Metrics
18 Record Views
Details
Title
Celebrity Journalism and the Conservatorship of Britney Spears
Creators
Miles John Paul Sari
Contributors
Ryan Thomas (Chair)
Elizabeth Blanks Hindman (Committee Member) - Washington State University, Journalism and Media Production, Department of
Amanda Boyd (Committee Member)
Awarding Institution
Washington State University
Academic Unit
Edward R. Murrow College of Communication
Theses and Dissertations
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Washington State University