Logo image
Unmasking Authenticity (or Lack Thereof): The Effect of Assurance and the Presentation of ESG Information on Whistleblowing Behavior Regarding ESG Misconduct
Dissertation

Unmasking Authenticity (or Lack Thereof): The Effect of Assurance and the Presentation of ESG Information on Whistleblowing Behavior Regarding ESG Misconduct

Cathy Sungmin Jun
Washington State University
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Washington State University
07/2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7273/000007899
pdf
Jun 2025 - Dissertation_5_22_20251.22 MB
Embargoed Access, Embargo ends: 10/14/2027 CC BY-NC-ND V4.0

Abstract

Authenticity ESG Assurance ESG Misconduct Management Controls Stand-Alone and Integrated ESG Reports Whistleblowing
With the surge of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) information, companies face mounting pressure from stakeholders to make meaningful progress on their ESG activities, creating an environment ripe for misconduct. Prior research focuses on curtailing misconduct by encouraging individuals to report on schemes driven by financial greed. Yet, the persistence of ESG misconduct with consistently lower levels of whistleblowing cases suggests that ESG misconduct poses unique challenges. I conduct an experiment to test how the presence of ESG assurance and the presentation of ESG reports with financial information jointly influence employees’ propensity to blow the whistle on ESG misconduct. I find that employees are more likely to blow the whistle when they encounter unassured integrated ESG reports relative to either assured or stand-alone ESG reports because they view the company’s ESG initiatives to be less authentic. My study may shed light on the best practices and regulations over ESG reporting.

Metrics

28 Record Views

Details

Logo image