COMPARISON OF DIGITAL AND CONVENTIONAL PATHOLOGY METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF VETERINARY BLOOD FILMS
Stephanie F. Anderson
Washington State University
Master of Science (MS), Washington State University
07/2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7273/000008009
Files and links (1)
pdf
Anderson, Stephanie Thesis785.00 kB
Embargoed Access, Embargo ends: 10/07/2026 CC BY V4.0
Abstract
Veterinary blood films Digital microscopy systems Veterinary diagnostic pathology Theileria haneyi
Background: Digital microscopy systems are used extensively in veterinary diagnostic pathology, but limited independent research has been published on its use, especially for the purpose of evaluating blood films. There is a need to determine potential limits of blood film assessments obtained via digital microscopy.
Objective: To compare the agreement of digital and glass cytology for the detection of common cellular morphology changes and abnormalities on veterinary blood films.
Methods: Twenty-two veterinary clinical pathologists and residents evaluated canine, feline and equine blood films on glass and digital slides, with an 8+ week washout period between evaluations. One of the equine cases was a patient experimentally infected with Theileria haneyi. Using a standardized rubric, sixteen erythrocyte features, two platelet features, and two leukocyte features were scored from absent to 4+. Additional comments at pathologist discretion were recorded.
Results: Erythrocyte shape changes, platelet changes and leukocyte changes were readily identified on digital and glass slides. Theileria haneyi organisms were identified on significantly fewer digital slides than the glass slides.
Conclusion: Relative to glass slides, digital blood films appear adequate to identify erythrocyte, leukocyte and platelet morphology changes, and inadequate to identify intracellular Theileria haneyi organisms. Clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting results from digital blood film assessments where there is concern for blood-borne infectious disease.
Metrics
12 Record Views
Details
Title
COMPARISON OF DIGITAL AND CONVENTIONAL PATHOLOGY METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF VETERINARY BLOOD FILMS
Creators
Stephanie F. Anderson
Contributors
Mara S Varvil (Chair)
Katherine Jane Wardrop (Committee Member)
Jillian Haines (Committee Member)
Laura White (Committee Member)
Awarding Institution
Washington State University
Academic Unit
College of Veterinary Medicine
Theses and Dissertations
Master of Science (MS), Washington State University